Why Taxation Matters
Taxes fund the services we all depend on. Without them, governments become asset-poor and unable to protect the most vulnerable in society. There is no such thing as a perfect tax system, but some taxes are more progressive than others. A fairer tax system supports equal opportunity, which is the foundation of real social mobility.
Progressive vs. Regressive
Progressive taxes ask more from those who can afford it. Regressive taxes fall hardest on low-income households.
Protecting the Vulnerable
A state with no assets cannot rescue those most in need during crises, whether housing, health, or climate emergencies.
Social Mobility
Ireland’s inequality is lower than in the UK or US, partly thanks to tax policy which raise funds from those with the deepest pockets, although more attention should be paid to extreme wealth and corporate loopholes.
Fair taxation doesn’t aim to equalize outcomes—it ensures a fair start in life. When designed well, it gives young people access to housing, healthcare, and education without leaving families solely dependent on inheritance or luck.
A poorly designed system, however, erodes fairness and fuels economic unfairness—where effort no longer matches reward. This creates the conditions for political instability and falling social mobility.
The challenge is not to design a “perfect” system, but to design one that minimizes harm and maximizes fairness. Taxes should work for the majority, not just the wealthy few. In developed societies, unfairness exists where there is too much focus on the maximisation of wealth, or, conversely, where aggressive redistribution to enforce equal outcomes creates a situation in which reward does not depend on effort anymore. When it comes to quality of life, radical individualism and reliance on market solutions alone will always fall short. Problems like healthcare, education, infrastructure, and climate change are too complex and interconnected for any one person — or even the free market — to solve by itself. That’s why societies build public institutions: so that when everyone contributes a little, we can create services and systems that benefit us all. The key is accountability — ensuring these institutions are transparent and effective, so people continue to trust in collective cooperation as the best path to improving lives. With a robust and strong public infrastructure in place, enterprise and the market can step in and innovate.
Wealth, Pandemic Profits & the Case for a Solidarity Tax
A Reuters analysis found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the share of global household wealth held by billionaires rose sharply — from just over 2% to around 3.5%. This growing concentration of wealth not only widened income gaps but also contributed to higher asset prices, including housing. When wealth compounds at the top during crises, capital flows increasingly toward property and investment assets, driving up house prices and making affordability worse for ordinary people. (Source: Reuters)
In Ireland, a former Minister for Social Integration floated the idea of a one-off solidarity tax on those who benefited most from the pandemic — individuals and corporations that saw exceptional profits while others struggled. The proposal, covered by RTÉ News, asked whether those least affected by lockdowns should contribute more to help rebuild public services and social supports.
According to the Minister, such a tax could provide a very real and tangible economic mechanism that could help offset the potential of the pandemic to deepen inequality
The idea was not about punishment but fair contribution. A temporary solidarity levy could help reclaim part of the extraordinary gains made during the crisis and channel them toward rebuilding essential public assets — healthcare, education, housing, and climate resilience. While not a permanent fix, such measures can promote fairness, reduce wealth distortions, and strengthen public trust in collective solutions.

Why wealth distribution matters
Growing wealth concentration is in fact a natural tendency of capitalism. A lot of attention is paid to the unfairness of redistributing any money away from the extremely wealthy. But if a society has no redistributive efforts, the redistribution will still happen, just the other way. Nobody likes paying taxes. But moderate taxation can redistribute wealth more fairly and fund social services, reduce wealth gaps, and promote greater economic equity in society. Therefore, if taxation can address the high levels of concentration in the digital industry, then it will likely serve as a useful tool to stimulate a more equal, innovative, and prosperous society.
Edna Krabappel on Fair Funding
In this clip, Edna asks for a modest cost-of-living adjustment to fund extra school books. Instead of support, she is shouted down—a parody of what underfunded teachers face in real life.
While the income tax system is highly progressive, taxation of big wealth in Ireland is low by international standards. Measures such as marginal 1-5% tax rises on the extreme wealth (e.g over 12 million) and our biggest polluters can prompt more fluidity in the housing market and help course correct this gradual transfer of assets to the super rich that has been happening in much of the developed world over the last few decades, and this is good for social mobility.We must remember: Growing wealth concentration over time is a natural tendency of capitalism. Thus, having sufficient guardrails against this increasing wealth inequality are essential for maintaining the social fabric of any modern democracy.